[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iKrLE69O+qOuhGG0ts2zmxJzw5jAAFLfzspi8uOQe8pQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2024 20:58:34 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>, Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: selftests: net: pmtu.sh: Unable to handle kernel paging request
at virtual address
On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 8:08 PM Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry for bringing up this issue, it recently occurred on my aarch64 kernel
> with blackhole_netdev backported. I tracked it down, and when deleting
> the netns, the path is:
>
> In cleanup_net():
>
> default_device_exit_batch()
> unregister_netdevice_many()
> addrconf_ifdown() -> call_rcu(rcu, fib6_info_destroy_rcu) <--- [1]
> netdev_run_todo()
> rcu_barrier() <- [2]
> ip6_route_net_exit() -> dst_entries_destroy(net->ip6_dst_ops) <--- [3]
>
> In fib6_info_destroy_rcu():
>
> dst_dev_put()
> dst_release() -> call_rcu(rcu, dst_destroy_rcu) <--- [5]
>
> In dst_destroy_rcu():
> dst_destroy() -> dst_entries_add(dst->ops, -1); <--- [6]
>
> fib6_info_destroy_rcu() is scheduled at [1], rcu_barrier() will wait
> for fib6_info_destroy_rcu() to be done at [2]. However, another callback
> dst_destroy_rcu() is scheduled() in fib6_info_destroy_rcu() at [5], and
> there's no place calling rcu_barrier() to wait for dst_destroy_rcu() to
> be done. It means dst_entries_add() at [6] might be run later than
> dst_entries_destroy() at [3], then this UAF will trigger the panic.
>
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 1:02 PM Naresh Kamboju
> <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 5 Sept 2023 at 17:55, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 1:52 PM Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 4 Sep 2023 13:29:57 +0200 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > > > > On Sun, Sep 3, 2023 at 5:57=E2=80=AFAM Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
> > > > > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:12:30 +0200 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > > > > > > --- a/net/core/dst.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/net/core/dst.c
> > > > > > > @@ -163,8 +163,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dst_dev_put);
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > void dst_release(struct dst_entry *dst)
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > - if (dst && rcuref_put(&dst->__rcuref))
> > > > > > > + if (dst && rcuref_put(&dst->__rcuref)) {
> > > > > > > + if (!(dst->flags & DST_NOCOUNT)) {
> > > > > > > + dst->flags |= DST_NOCOUNT;
> > > > > > > + dst_entries_add(dst->ops, -1);
> > > > > >
> So I think it makes sense to NOT call dst_entries_add() in the path
> dst_destroy_rcu() -> dst_destroy(), as it does on the patch above,
> but I don't see it get posted.
>
> Hi, Eric, would you like to move forward with your patch above ?
>
> Or we can also move the dst_entries_add(dst->ops, -1) from dst_destroy()
> to dst_release():
>
> Note, dst_destroy() is not used outside net/core/dst.c, we may delete
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(dst_destroy) in the future.
>
>
Current kernel has known issue with dst_cache, triggering quite often
with selftests: net: pmtu.sh
(Although for some reason it does no longer trigger 'often' any more
in my vng tests)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists