linux-kernel - [PATCH bpf v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: fix perf_event link info name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241006195131.563006-2-wudevelops@gmail.com>
Date: Sun,  6 Oct 2024 19:51:31 +0000
From: tyrone-wu <wudevelops@...il.com>
To: laoar.shao@...il.com,
	wudevelops@...il.com
Cc: andrii.nakryiko@...il.com,
	andrii@...nel.org,
	ast@...nel.org,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	daniel@...earbox.net,
	eddyz87@...il.com,
	haoluo@...gle.com,
	john.fastabend@...il.com,
	jolsa@...nel.org,
	kernel-patches-bot@...com,
	kpsingh@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	martin.lau@...ux.dev,
	mykolal@...com,
	olsajiri@...il.com,
	sdf@...ichev.me,
	shuah@...nel.org,
	song@...nel.org,
	yonghong.song@...ux.dev
Subject: [PATCH bpf v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: fix perf_event link info name_len assertion

Fix `name_len` field assertions in `bpf_link_info.perf_event` for
kprobe/uprobe/tracepoint to validate correct name size instead of 0.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CABVU1kXwQXhqQGe0RTrr7eegtM6SVW_KayZBy16-yb0Snztmtg@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 23cf7aa539dc ("selftests/bpf: Add selftest for fill_link_info")
Signed-off-by: tyrone-wu <wudevelops@...il.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
---
V4 -> V5: no change

V3 -> V4:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Zv_PP6Gs5cq3W2Ey@krava/
- Split patch into separate kernel and selftest change

 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c
index f3932941bbaa..59077f260404 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c
@@ -67,8 +67,8 @@ static int verify_perf_link_info(int fd, enum bpf_perf_event_type type, long add
 
 		ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.kprobe.cookie, PERF_EVENT_COOKIE, "kprobe_cookie");
 
+		ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.kprobe.name_len, strlen(KPROBE_FUNC) + 1, "name_len");
 		if (!info.perf_event.kprobe.func_name) {
-			ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.kprobe.name_len, 0, "name_len");
 			info.perf_event.kprobe.func_name = ptr_to_u64(&buf);
 			info.perf_event.kprobe.name_len = sizeof(buf);
 			goto again;
@@ -79,8 +79,8 @@ static int verify_perf_link_info(int fd, enum bpf_perf_event_type type, long add
 		ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "cmp_kprobe_func_name");
 		break;
 	case BPF_PERF_EVENT_TRACEPOINT:
+		ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.tracepoint.name_len, strlen(TP_NAME) + 1, "name_len");
 		if (!info.perf_event.tracepoint.tp_name) {
-			ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.tracepoint.name_len, 0, "name_len");
 			info.perf_event.tracepoint.tp_name = ptr_to_u64(&buf);
 			info.perf_event.tracepoint.name_len = sizeof(buf);
 			goto again;
@@ -96,8 +96,8 @@ static int verify_perf_link_info(int fd, enum bpf_perf_event_type type, long add
 	case BPF_PERF_EVENT_URETPROBE:
 		ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.uprobe.offset, offset, "uprobe_offset");
 
+		ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.uprobe.name_len, strlen(UPROBE_FILE) + 1, "name_len");
 		if (!info.perf_event.uprobe.file_name) {
-			ASSERT_EQ(info.perf_event.uprobe.name_len, 0, "name_len");
 			info.perf_event.uprobe.file_name = ptr_to_u64(&buf);
 			info.perf_event.uprobe.name_len = sizeof(buf);
 			goto again;
-- 
2.43.0