[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ed4tuhom.ffs@tglx>
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2024 21:58:49 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Russell King
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/21] genirq: Introduce number_of_interrupts() and
set_number_of_interrupts()
On Thu, Oct 03 2024 at 14:01, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/2/24 8:49 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> How about irq_count() and irq_set_count()?
>>
>> Sure.
>
> I just noticed that a macro with the name irq_count() already exists.
> How about the names irq_get_nr_irqs() and irq_set_nr_irqs() instead?
Sounds good to me.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists