linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH] sched/syscalls: Allow setting niceness using sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AtJ8bVeW6K8aXAFMtYW-Ml-HEP0RuugWjDr9P9O9B3SPNVaL-gl0FjK7AI64AJ6j8l5PmzLKdGUxFOhpT65twtth2huCrLQKDBu0sWaufdk=@pm.me>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 00:48:04 +0000
From: Michael Pratt <mcpratt@...me>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] sched/syscalls: Allow setting niceness using sched_param struct

Hi everyone, again,

I'm still waiting for a serious review of this very short patch after about a month.
I'll be getting ready to send this a 3rd time, and to more people, if I don't hear back again.

I believe that I have correctly addressed Peter's concerns in my replies,
and that my patch is still appropriate for inclusion into Linux as it is now.

If I'm wrong please let me know why instead of just silence.

--
MCP