[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0f4a2226-b4c1-3440-12c4-19ed36e02979@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 14:42:06 -0700
From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
CC: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, LKML
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ice: Unbind the workqueue
On 10/7/2024 3:29 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Le Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 11:28:20AM -0700, Tony Nguyen a écrit :
...
>>> Thank you for the patch, it would make sense for our iwl-next tree,
>>> with such assumption:
>>> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
>>>
>>> @Tony, do you want it resent with target tree in the subject?
>>
>> No, I can apply this as-is but please remember to designate a tree for
>> future patches.
>
> Sorry I didn't know about any tree. I can't even find where iwl-next is
> hosted.
The information is here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/MAINTAINERS#n11413
For bug fixes, net-queue tree is used and next-queue for other content
(dev-queue branch for both).
I did find that I crossed this patch with another and found that the
initial send of this did not include the Intel Wired LAN list. I'll
resend the patch to include the proper list so that patchworks can pick
this up.
Thanks,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists