[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241007084831.48067-1-ubizjak@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 10:48:04 +0200
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
To: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] md/raid5-ppl: Use atomic64_inc_return() in ppl_new_iounit()
Use atomic64_inc_return(&ref) instead of atomic64_add_return(1, &ref)
to use optimized implementation and ease register pressure around
the primitive for targets that implement optimized variant.
Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
Cc: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
---
drivers/md/raid5-ppl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-ppl.c b/drivers/md/raid5-ppl.c
index a70cbec12ed0..37c4da5311ca 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5-ppl.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5-ppl.c
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static struct ppl_io_unit *ppl_new_iounit(struct ppl_log *log,
memset(pplhdr->reserved, 0xff, PPL_HDR_RESERVED);
pplhdr->signature = cpu_to_le32(ppl_conf->signature);
- io->seq = atomic64_add_return(1, &ppl_conf->seq);
+ io->seq = atomic64_inc_return(&ppl_conf->seq);
pplhdr->generation = cpu_to_le64(io->seq);
return io;
--
2.46.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists