linux-kernel - Re: [BUG almost bisected] Splat in dequeue_rt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241007093412.GA4879@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 11:34:12 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: vschneid@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [BUG almost bisected] Splat in dequeue_rt_stack() and build error

On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 01:44:53PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> > I've given it 200*20m and the worst I got was one dl-server double
> > enqueue. I'll go stare at that I suppose.
> 
> With your patch, I got 24 failures out of 100 TREE03 runs of 18 hours
> each.  The failures were different, though, mostly involving boost
> failures in which RCU priority boosting didn't actually result in the
> low-priority readers getting boosted.  An ftrace/event-trace dump of
> such a situation is shown below.

Urgh, WTF and more of that. Let me go ponder things.

Thanks for testing.