lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024100737-audacious-subplot-7f4a@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 11:53:45 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Alex Lanzano <lanzano.alex@...il.com>,
	Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait@...tlin.com>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
	Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christophe Jaillet <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] Add driver for Sharp Memory LCD

On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 11:34:13AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > This patch series add support for the monochrome Sharp Memory LCD panels.
> …
> > ---
> > Changes in v9:
> …
> 
> Would you like to benefit from the application of scope-based resource management
> (also for this software component)?

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ