linux-kernel - Re: Regression in PMC code in 6.12-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGcaFA1zqcqRNNydCZwn1pXUrjgSwvpLcVrf-ecFub2CABLiUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 12:57:06 +0200
From: Marek Maślanka <mmaslanka@...gle.com>
To: Luca Coelho <luca@...lho.fi>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hdegoede@...hat.com, 
	daniel.lezcano@...aro.org
Subject: Re: Regression in PMC code in 6.12-rc1

Hi Luca,

Thanks for the report.

Seems that the tick_freeze function in the kernel/time/tick-common.c
is helding the spinlock so the pmc_core_acpi_pm_timer_suspend_resume
shouldn't try to take the mutex lock. I'll look for the solution.

Marek


On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 11:17 AM Luca Coelho <luca@...lho.fi> wrote:
>
> Hi Marek et al,
>
> We have been facing some errors when running some of our Display CI
> tests that seem to have been introduced by the following commit:
>
> e86c8186d03a ("platform/x86:intel/pmc: Enable the ACPI PM Timer to be turned off when suspended")
>
> The errors we are getting look like this:
>
> <4> [222.857770] =============================
> <4> [222.857771] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
> <4> [222.857772] 6.12.0-rc1-xe #1 Not tainted
> <4> [222.857773] -----------------------------
> <4> [222.857774] swapper/4/0 is trying to lock:
> <4> [222.857775] ffff8881174c88c8 (&pmcdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pmc_core_acpi_pm_timer_suspend_resume+0x50/0xe0 [intel_pmc_core]
> <4> [222.857782] other info that might help us debug this:
> <4> [222.857783] context-{4:4}
> <4> [222.857784] 1 lock held by swapper/4/0:
> <4> [222.857785]  #0: ffffffff83452258 (tick_freeze_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: tick_freeze+0x16/0x110
> <4> [222.857791] stack backtrace:
> <4> [222.857793] CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/4 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc1-xe #1
> <4> [222.857794] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Alder Lake Client Platform/AlderLake-P DDR5 RVP, BIOS RPLPFWI1.R00.4035.A00.2301200723 01/20/2023
> <4> [222.857796] Call Trace:
> <4> [222.857797]  <TASK>
> <4> [222.857798]  dump_stack_lvl+0x80/0xc0
> <4> [222.857802]  dump_stack+0x10/0x20
> <4> [222.857805]  __lock_acquire+0x943/0x2800
> <4> [222.857808]  ? stack_trace_save+0x4b/0x70
> <4> [222.857812]  lock_acquire+0xc5/0x2f0
> <4> [222.857814]  ? pmc_core_acpi_pm_timer_suspend_resume+0x50/0xe0 [intel_pmc_core]
> <4> [222.857817]  __mutex_lock+0xbe/0xc70
> <4> [222.857819]  ? pmc_core_acpi_pm_timer_suspend_resume+0x50/0xe0 [intel_pmc_core]
> <4> [222.857822]  ? pmc_core_acpi_pm_timer_suspend_resume+0x50/0xe0 [intel_pmc_core]
> <4> [222.857825]  mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
> <4> [222.857827]  ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
> <4> [222.857828]  pmc_core_acpi_pm_timer_suspend_resume+0x50/0xe0 [intel_pmc_core]
> <4> [222.857831]  acpi_pm_suspend+0x23/0x40
> <4> [222.857834]  clocksource_suspend+0x2b/0x50
> <4> [222.857836]  timekeeping_suspend+0x22a/0x360
> <4> [222.857839]  tick_freeze+0x89/0x110
> <4> [222.857840]  enter_s2idle_proper+0x34/0x1d0
> <4> [222.857843]  cpuidle_enter_s2idle+0xaa/0x120
> <4> [222.857845]  ? tsc_verify_tsc_adjust+0x42/0x100
> <4> [222.857849]  do_idle+0x221/0x250
> <4> [222.857852]  cpu_startup_entry+0x29/0x30
> <4> [222.857854]  start_secondary+0x12e/0x160
> <4> [222.857856]  common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141
> <4> [222.857859]  </TASK>
>
> And the full logs can be found, for example, here:
>
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-2016-92d12099cc768f36cf676ee1b014442a5c5ba965/shard-adlp-3/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html
>
>
> Reverting this commit seems to prevent the problem.  Do you have any
> idea what could be causing this and, more importantly, how to fix it?
> :)
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Luca.