linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 6/6] iommu/amd: Lock DTE before updating the entry with WRITE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241007041353.4756-7-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 04:13:53 +0000
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>
CC: <joro@...tes.org>, <robin.murphy@....com>, <vasant.hegde@....com>,
	<jgg@...dia.com>, <kevin.tian@...el.com>, <jon.grimm@....com>,
	<santosh.shukla@....com>, <pandoh@...gle.com>, <kumaranand@...gle.com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 6/6] iommu/amd: Lock DTE before updating the entry with WRITE_ONCE()

When updating only within a 64-bit tuple of a DTE, just lock the DTE and
use WRITE_ONCE() because it is writing to memory read back by HW.

Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
---
 drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
index dd7b02b00be6..18a60b4345f1 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c
@@ -2783,12 +2783,12 @@ static int amd_iommu_set_dirty_tracking(struct iommu_domain *domain,
 					bool enable)
 {
 	struct protection_domain *pdomain = to_pdomain(domain);
-	struct dev_table_entry *dev_table;
+	struct dev_table_entry *dte;
 	struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data;
 	bool domain_flush = false;
 	struct amd_iommu *iommu;
 	unsigned long flags;
-	u64 pte_root;
+	u64 new;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&pdomain->lock, flags);
 	if (!(pdomain->dirty_tracking ^ enable)) {
@@ -2797,16 +2797,15 @@ static int amd_iommu_set_dirty_tracking(struct iommu_domain *domain,
 	}
 
 	list_for_each_entry(dev_data, &pdomain->dev_list, list) {
+		spin_lock(&dev_data->dte_lock);
 		iommu = get_amd_iommu_from_dev_data(dev_data);
-
-		dev_table = get_dev_table(iommu);
-		pte_root = dev_table[dev_data->devid].data[0];
-
-		pte_root = (enable ? pte_root | DTE_FLAG_HAD :
-				     pte_root & ~DTE_FLAG_HAD);
+		dte = &get_dev_table(iommu)[dev_data->devid];
+		new = dte->data[0];
+		new = (enable ? new | DTE_FLAG_HAD : new & ~DTE_FLAG_HAD);
+		WRITE_ONCE(dte->data[0], new);
+		spin_unlock(&dev_data->dte_lock);
 
 		/* Flush device DTE */
-		dev_table[dev_data->devid].data[0] = pte_root;
 		device_flush_dte(dev_data);
 		domain_flush = true;
 	}
@@ -3071,17 +3070,24 @@ static void iommu_flush_irt_and_complete(struct amd_iommu *iommu, u16 devid)
 static void set_dte_irq_entry(struct amd_iommu *iommu, u16 devid,
 			      struct irq_remap_table *table)
 {
-	u64 dte;
-	struct dev_table_entry *dev_table = get_dev_table(iommu);
+	u64 new;
+	struct dev_table_entry *dte = &get_dev_table(iommu)[devid];
+	struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data = search_dev_data(iommu, devid);
+
+	if (dev_data)
+		spin_lock(&dev_data->dte_lock);
+
+	new = dte->data[2];
+	new &= ~DTE_IRQ_PHYS_ADDR_MASK;
+	new |= iommu_virt_to_phys(table->table);
+	new |= DTE_IRQ_REMAP_INTCTL;
+	new |= DTE_INTTABLEN;
+	new |= DTE_IRQ_REMAP_ENABLE;
 
-	dte	= dev_table[devid].data[2];
-	dte	&= ~DTE_IRQ_PHYS_ADDR_MASK;
-	dte	|= iommu_virt_to_phys(table->table);
-	dte	|= DTE_IRQ_REMAP_INTCTL;
-	dte	|= DTE_INTTABLEN;
-	dte	|= DTE_IRQ_REMAP_ENABLE;
+	WRITE_ONCE(dte->data[2], new);
 
-	dev_table[devid].data[2] = dte;
+	if (dev_data)
+		spin_unlock(&dev_data->dte_lock);
 }
 
 static struct irq_remap_table *get_irq_table(struct amd_iommu *iommu, u16 devid)
-- 
2.34.1