[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2fad1566-49f9-4586-b0d4-8a4a12f9e69e@denx.de>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 15:54:26 +0200
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>,
Olivia Mackall <olivia@...enic.com>, Herbert Xu
<herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Lionel Debieve <lionel.debieve@...s.st.com>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] hwrng: stm32 - implement support for STM32MP25x
platforms
On 10/7/24 3:27 PM, Gatien Chevallier wrote:
> Implement the support for STM32MP25x platforms. On this platform, a
> security clock is shared between some hardware blocks. For the RNG,
> it is the RNG kernel clock. Therefore, the gate is no more shared
> between the RNG bus and kernel clocks as on STM32MP1x platforms and
> the bus clock has to be managed on its own.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gatien Chevallier <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>
A bit of a higher-level design question -- can you use
drivers/clk/clk-bulk.c clk_bulk_*() to handle all these disparate count
of clock easily ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists