linux-kernel - Re: Aw: Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: spi: add compatibles for mt7988

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <00894b3b-a79f-4d6f-bdfb-249535901e00@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:16:31 +0200
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Frank Wunderlich <linux@...web.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 Leilk Liu <leilk.liu@...iatek.com>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
 daniel@...rotopia.org, john@...ozen.org, eladwf@...il.com,
 ansuelsmth@...il.com
Subject: Re: Aw: Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: spi: add compatibles for mt7988



On 06/10/2024 17:11, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> Hi
> 
>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 06. Oktober 2024 um 14:48 Uhr
>> Von: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@...nel.org>
>> Betreff: Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: spi: add compatibles for mt7988
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 12:27:39PM +0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>>> From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
>>>
>>> MT7988 has 2 different spi controllers. Add mediatek,ipm-spi-single
>>> and mediatek,ipm-spi-quad compatibles.
>>
>> Why generic compatibles?
>>
>> These are supposed to be SoC-specific.
> 
> currently i used the compatibles used in SDK, but got info now, that there is some more discussion needed with mtk.
> 

Ok, but please don't introduce generic compatibles. We prever SoC specific ones 
with a fall-back (to a different SoC specific one).

Regards,
Matthias