[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <972aac8f17afedde8c4ba8b5fb4be560f6e49672.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 14:29:39 +0000
From: Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) <Jason-JH.Lin@...iatek.com>
To: "me@...mthiede.com" <me@...mthiede.com>, "yassine.oudjana@...il.com"
<yassine.oudjana@...il.com>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, "chunkuang.hu@...nel.org"
<chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"alpernebiyasak@...il.com" <alpernebiyasak@...il.com>,
Singo Chang (張興國) <Singo.Chang@...iatek.com>,
Shawn Sung (宋孝謙) <Shawn.Sung@...iatek.com>,
Nancy Lin (林欣螢) <Nancy.Lin@...iatek.com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/5] drm/mediatek: ovl: Fix XRGB format breakage for
blend_modes unsupported SoCs
Hi Angelo,
Thanks for the reviews.
On Mon, 2024-10-07 at 11:36 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 07/10/24 09:00, Jason-JH.Lin ha scritto:
> > If the constant alpha always enable, the SoCs that is not supported
> > the
> > ignore pixel alpha bit will still use constant alpha. That will
> > break
> > the original constant alpha setting of XRGB foramt for blend_modes
> > unsupported SoCs, such as MT8173.
> >
> > Note that ignore pixel alpha bit is suppored if the SoC support the
> > blend_modes.
> > Make the constatnt alpha only enable when having a vliad blend_mode
> > or
> > setting the has_alpha to fix the downgrade issue.
> >
> > Fixes: bc46eb5d5d77 ("drm/mediatek: Support DRM plane alpha in
> > OVL")
> > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c | 8 +++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c
> > index 89b439dcf3a6..8453a72f9e59 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c
> > @@ -473,8 +473,14 @@ void mtk_ovl_layer_config(struct device *dev,
> > unsigned int idx,
> >
> > con = ovl_fmt_convert(ovl, fmt, blend_mode);
Because con is a local variable declared in the beginning of
mtk_ovl_layer_config() and then being assigned to the return value of
ovl_fmt_convert() here.
> > if (state->base.fb) {
> > - con |= OVL_CON_AEN;
> > con |= state->base.alpha & OVL_CON_ALPHA;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * For blend_modes supported SoCs, always enable
> > constant alpha.
> > + * For blend_modes unsupported SoCs, enable constant
> > alpha when has_alpha is set.
> > + */
> > + if (blend_mode || state->base.fb->format->has_alpha)
> > + con |= OVL_CON_AEN;
>
> I'd say that you should make sure that OVL_CON_AEN is not set when
> !blend_mode && !has_alpha, and you can do that like this:
>
> if (blend_mode || state->base.fb->format->has_alpha)
> con |= OVL_CON_AEN;
I think the OVL_CON_AEN won't be set when !blend_mode && !has_alpha.
Can I drop the else case here?
> else
> con &= ~OVL_CON_AEN;
Regards,
Jason-JH.Lin
>
> After applying the proposed change,
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists