linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] soc: mediatek: mtk-cmdq-helper: Various cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8471ba7d-20a3-487a-8abe-f0fcf844c709@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:36:12 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] soc: mediatek: mtk-cmdq-helper: Various cleanups

Il 07/10/24 16:33, Matthias Brugger ha scritto:
> 
> 
> On 03/10/2024 10:08, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 02/10/24 15:00, Matthias Brugger ha scritto:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/10/2024 11:08, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 12:06:17 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>>>> This series performs various cleanups to the MediaTek CMDQ Helper lib,
>>>>> reducing code duplication and enhancing human readability.
>>>>>
>>>>> This also avoids double initialization struct cmdq_instruction as,
>>>>> in some cases, it was stack-initialized to zero and then overwritten
>>>>> completely anyway a bit later.
>>>>> I'd expect compilers to be somehow smart about that, but still, while
>>>>> at it ... why not :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> Applied to v6.12-next/soc, thanks!
>>>>
>>>> [1/3] soc: mediatek: mtk-cmdq: Move mask build and append to function
>>>>        https://git.kernel.org/mediatek/c/2400e830
>>>> [2/3] soc: mediatek: mtk-cmdq: Mark very unlikely branches as such
>>>>        https://git.kernel.org/mediatek/c/21ab3dae
>>>> [3/3] soc: mediatek: mtk-cmdq: Move cmdq_instruction init to declaration
>>>>        https://git.kernel.org/mediatek/c/66705b89
>>>>
>>>
>>> You probably oversaw the sparse warning email on 3/3?
>>>
>>> As I oversaw that you already merged this.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, I did. There's no problem anyway, as we can always replace the commits
>> without noise, I haven't pushed anything to -next :-)
>>
>> I plan to do that (drop patch 2/3, delete `.mask = 0` on 3/3) soon, at max
>> next week anyway.
>>
> 
> Perfect, before you do any locally please pull from remote as I did some changes, 
> not sure if you saw my message on IRC.
> 
> Regarding -next: we don't need to keep commit history in linux-next neither, to 
> even it got pushed to -next, we can drop patches in the queue with any problem.

My day was pretty full, I didn't. Thanks for shooting the email :-D

> 
> Have a nice afternoon :)

You too!
Angelo