linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 06/12] net: ethtool: Add PSE new port priority support feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZwVJNomEzQJOr8jx@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:01:10 +0200
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Kyle Swenson <kyle.swenson@....tech>,
	Dent Project <dentproject@...uxfoundation.org>,
	kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/12] net: ethtool: Add PSE new port priority
 support feature

On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 02:56:17PM +0200, Kory Maincent wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:23:00 +0200
> Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:10:33 +0200
> > Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > User will not understand why devices fail to provide enough power by
> > > attaching two device to one domain and not failing by attaching to
> > > different domains. Except we provide this information to the user space.
> > 
> > What you are explaining seems neat on the paper but I don't know the best way
> > to implement it. It needs more brainstorming.
> 
> Is it ok for you if we go further with this patch series and continue talking
> about PSE power domain alongside?
> It should not be necessary to be supported with port priority as the two PSE
> supported controller can behave autonomously on a power domain.
> I hope I will have time in the project to add its support when we will have a
> more precise idea of how.

Ok.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |