[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8481e803-a2bf-46be-b5f9-a39570ed330f@web.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:25:10 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Rosen Penev <rosenp@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ibm: emac: mal: fix wrong goto
> dcr_map is called in the previous if and therefore needs to be unmapped.
How do you think about to choose an additional imperative wording
for an improved change description?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.12-rc2#n94
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists