[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241008183501.1354695-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 13:34:56 -0500
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@...el.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...lia.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] perf: Fix pmu for drivers with bind/unbind
v2 of my attempt at fixing how i915 interacts with perf events.
v1 - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240722210648.80892-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com/
>From other people:
1) https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240115170120.662220-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com/
2) https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240213180302.47266-1-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com/
WARNING: patches 1, 4 and 5 are NOT intended to be applied as is. More
on this below.
This series basically builds on the idea of the first patch of my
previous series, but extends it in a way that
a) the other patches are not needed (at least, not as is) and
b) driver can rebind just fine - no issues with the new call to
perf_pmu_register()
Another difference is that rather than mixing i915 cleanups this just
adds a dummy pmu with no backing HW. Intention for dummy_pmu is for
experimental purpose and to demonstrate changes tha need to be applied
to i915 (and probably amdgpu, and also in the pending xe patch).
If desired to have an example like that in tree, then we should hide it
behind a config option and I'd need to re-check the error handling.
With this set I could run the following test script multiple times with
no issues observed:
#!/bin/bash
set -e
rand_sleep() {
sleep $(bc -l <<< "$(shuf -i 0-3000 -n 1) / 1000")
}
test_noperf() {
echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/dummy_pmu/bind
echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/dummy_pmu/unbind
}
test_perf_before() {
echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/dummy_pmu/bind
perf stat --interval-count 2 -e dummy_pmu_0/test-event-1/ -I500
echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/dummy_pmu/unbind
}
test_kill_perf_later() {
echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/dummy_pmu/bind
perf stat -e dummy_pmu_0/test-event-1/ -I500 &
pid=$!
rand_sleep
echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/dummy_pmu/unbind
rand_sleep
kill $pid
}
test_kill_perf_laaaaaaater() {
echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/dummy_pmu/bind
perf stat -e dummy_pmu_0/test-event-1/ -I500 &
pid=$!
rand_sleep
echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/dummy_pmu/unbind
rand_sleep
rand_sleep
rand_sleep
kill $pid
}
test_kill_perf_with_leader() {
echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/dummy_pmu/bind
perf stat -e '{dummy_pmu_0/test-event-1/,dummy_pmu_0/test-event-2/}:S' -I500 &
pid=$!
rand_sleep
echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/dummy_pmu/unbind
rand_sleep
rand_sleep
kill $pid
}
N=${1:-1}
for ((i=0; i<N; i++)); do
printf "%04u/%04u\n" "$((i+1))" "$N" >&2
test_noperf
test_perf_before
test_kill_perf_later
test_kill_perf_laaaaaaater
test_kill_perf_with_leader
echo >&2
done
Last patch is optional for a driver and not needed for the fix.
Open topics:
- If something like the last patch is desirable, should it be
done from inside perf_pmu_unregister()?
- Should we have a dummy_pmu (or whatever name) behind a config,
or maybe in Documentation/ ?
thanks,
Lucas De Marchi
Lucas De Marchi (5):
perf: Add dummy pmu module
perf: Move free outside of the mutex
perf: Add pmu get/put
perf/dummy_pmu: Tie pmu to device lifecycle
perf/dummy_pmu: Track and disable active events
include/linux/perf_event.h | 12 +
kernel/events/Makefile | 1 +
kernel/events/core.c | 39 ++-
kernel/events/dummy_pmu.c | 492 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 539 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 kernel/events/dummy_pmu.c
--
2.46.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists