[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241008194718.9682-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:47:16 +0200
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Subject: [net-next PATCH v3] net: phy: Validate PHY LED OPs presence before registering
Validate PHY LED OPs presence before registering and parsing them.
Defining LED nodes for a PHY driver that actually doesn't supports them
is redundant and useless.
It's also the case with Generic PHY driver used and a DT having LEDs
node for the specific PHY.
Skip it and report the error with debug print enabled.
Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
---
Changes v3:
- Make condition more readable
Changes v2:
- Use phydev_dbg instead of warn
drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
index 499797646580..e4a1d0e74e47 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
@@ -3421,6 +3421,16 @@ static int of_phy_leds(struct phy_device *phydev)
if (!leds)
return 0;
+ /* Check if the PHY driver have at least an OP to
+ * set the LEDs.
+ */
+ if (!(phydev->drv->led_brightness_set ||
+ phydev->drv->led_blink_set ||
+ phydev->drv->led_hw_control_set)) {
+ phydev_dbg(phydev, "ignoring leds node defined with no PHY driver support\n");
+ goto exit;
+ }
+
for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped(leds, led) {
err = of_phy_led(phydev, led);
if (err) {
@@ -3430,6 +3440,7 @@ static int of_phy_leds(struct phy_device *phydev)
}
}
+exit:
of_node_put(leds);
return 0;
}
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists