[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241008205352.4480-1-everestkc@everestkc.com.np>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 14:53:48 -0600
From: "Everest K.C." <everestkc@...restkc.com.np>
To: lucas.demarchi@...el.com,
thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com,
rodrigo.vivi@...el.com,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
mripard@...nel.org,
tzimmermann@...e.de,
airlied@...il.com,
simona@...ll.ch
Cc: "Everest K.C." <everestkc@...restkc.com.np>,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm/xe/guc: Fix deference after check
The `if (!snapshot->copy)` evaluates to True only when `snapshot->copy`
is Null. Thus, derefrencing `snapshot->copy` inside this if block is
equivalent to Null pointer derefrencing.
The `if` condition is now changed to evaluate to true only when
`snapshot->copy` is not Null.
This issue was reported by Coverity Scan.
Signed-off-by: Everest K.C. <everestkc@...restkc.com.np>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.c
index 7fbc56cceaba..4e1a5e8ba1e3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_log.c
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ void xe_guc_log_snapshot_free(struct xe_guc_log_snapshot *snapshot)
if (!snapshot)
return;
- if (!snapshot->copy) {
+ if (snapshot->copy) {
for (i = 0; i < snapshot->num_chunks; i++)
kfree(snapshot->copy[i]);
kfree(snapshot->copy);
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists