linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v4] list: test: Check the size of every lists for list_cut

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZwTfWH6E3jtfBXqF@visitorckw-System-Product-Name>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:29:28 +0800
From: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>
To: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@...il.com>
Cc: davidgow@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	kunit-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4] list: test: Check the size of every lists for
 list_cut_position*()

Hi I Hsin,

On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 02:51:23PM +0800, I Hsin Cheng wrote:
> Check the total number of elements in both resultant lists are correct
> within list_cut_position*(). Previously, only the first list's size was
> checked. wo additional elements in the second list would not have been
> caught.
> 
> Signed-off-by: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@...il.com>
> ---
> change in v4:
> 	Amend the description of commit message, make it less confusing
> 	and focus on the correct check which is performed now.
>
Generally, we don't add the prefix "RESEND" to the subject line of the
next version of a patch. "RESEND" is only used for resubmissions of a
patch that hasn't been modified in any way from the previous submission.

See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.11/process/submitting-patches.html#don-t-get-discouraged-or-impatient

Regards,
Kuan-Wei