[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024100803-reshoot-reburial-a9eb@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:22:14 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Zhu Jun <zhujun2@...s.chinamobile.com>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/applicom:Remove redundant ret variable in
ac_read function
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 12:48:18AM -0700, Zhu Jun wrote:
> Removed the unused variable 'ret' from the ac_read function
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun <zhujun2@...s.chinamobile.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/applicom.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/applicom.c b/drivers/char/applicom.c
> index ea25caf35346..ba512d8dffba 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/applicom.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/applicom.c
> @@ -536,7 +536,6 @@ static ssize_t ac_read (struct file *filp, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_
> unsigned long flags;
> unsigned int i;
> unsigned char tmp;
> - int ret = 0;
> DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
> #ifdef DEBUG
> int loopcount=0;
> @@ -567,7 +566,7 @@ static ssize_t ac_read (struct file *filp, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_
>
> /* Got a packet for us */
> memset(&st_loc, 0, sizeof(st_loc));
> - ret = do_ac_read(i, buf, &st_loc, &mailbox);
> + do_ac_read(i, buf, &st_loc, &mailbox);
Why not check that this worked properly instead? Can you test this
change? Why make this change if you can not?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists