[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241008112458.49387-3-chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 11:24:57 +0000
From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@...weicloud.com>
To: martin.lau@...ux.dev,
ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org,
eddyz87@...il.com,
song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...gle.com,
haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org,
tj@...nel.org,
lizefan.x@...edance.com,
hannes@...xchg.org,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
mkoutny@...e.com
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chenridong@...wei.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 2/3] workqueue: doc: Add a note saturating the system_wq is not permitted
From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@...wei.com>
If something is expected to generate large number of concurrent works,
it should utilize its own dedicated workqueue rather than system wq.
Because this may saturate system_wq and potentially block other's works.
eg, cgroup release work. Let's document this as a note.
Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@...wei.com>
---
Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst b/Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst
index 16f861c9791e..2b813f80ce39 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst
@@ -357,6 +357,11 @@ Guidelines
difference in execution characteristics between using a dedicated wq
and a system wq.
+ Note: If something may generate more than @max_active outstanding
+ work items (do stress test your producers), it may saturate a system
+ wq and potentially lead to deadlock. It should utilize its own
+ dedicated workqueue rather than the system wq.
+
* Unless work items are expected to consume a huge amount of CPU
cycles, using a bound wq is usually beneficial due to the increased
level of locality in wq operations and work item execution.
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists