[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4372d54-34bb-4a32-8742-ea6aacc0848c@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 14:20:15 +0100
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Catalin Marinas
<catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] arm64/mm: Drop pte_mkhuge()
On 05/10/2024 13:38, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Core HugeTLB defines arch_make_huge_pte() fallback definition, which calls
> platform provided pte_mkhuge(). But if any platform already provides custom
> arch_make_huge_pte(), then it does not need to provide pte_mkhuge(). arm64
> defines arch_make_huge_pte(), but then also calls pte_mkhuge() internally.
> This creates confusion as if both of these callbacks are being used in core
> HugeTLB and required to be defined in the platform.
>
> This changes arch_make_huge_pte() to create block mapping directly and also
> drops off now redundant helper pte_mkhuge(), making things clear. Also this
> changes HugeTLB page creation from just clearing the PTE_TABLE_BIT (bit[1])
> to actually setting bits[1:0] via PTE_TYPE_[MASK|SECT] instead.
>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 5 -----
> arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h
> index fd330c1db289..956a702cb532 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h
> @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@
> #define PTE_VALID (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 0)
> #define PTE_TYPE_MASK (_AT(pteval_t, 3) << 0)
> #define PTE_TYPE_PAGE (_AT(pteval_t, 3) << 0)
> +#define PTE_TYPE_SECT (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 0)
> #define PTE_TABLE_BIT (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 1)
> #define PTE_USER (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 6) /* AP[1] */
> #define PTE_RDONLY (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 7) /* AP[2] */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index c329ea061dc9..fa4c32a9f572 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -438,11 +438,6 @@ static inline void __set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm,
> }
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Huge pte definitions.
> - */
> -#define pte_mkhuge(pte) (__pte(pte_val(pte) & ~PTE_TABLE_BIT))
> -
> /*
> * Hugetlb definitions.
> */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> index 5f1e2103888b..5922c95630ad 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ pte_t arch_make_huge_pte(pte_t entry, unsigned int shift, vm_flags_t flags)
> {
> size_t pagesize = 1UL << shift;
>
> - entry = pte_mkhuge(entry);
> + entry = __pte((pte_val(entry) & ~PTE_TYPE_MASK) | PTE_TYPE_SECT);
I think there may be an existing bug here; if pagesize == CONT_PTE_SIZE, then
entry will be placed in the level 3 table. In this case, shouldn't bit 1 remain
set, because at level 3, a page mapping is denoted by bits[1:0] = 3 ? Currently
its being unconditionally cleared.
> if (pagesize == CONT_PTE_SIZE) {
> entry = pte_mkcont(entry);
> } else if (pagesize == CONT_PMD_SIZE) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists