[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFprgKOBGnnvJUvVxXUTPEHGJMXXQa_HssXxEt01aBRoVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 15:23:20 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
YiFeng Zhao <zyf@...k-chips.com>, Liang Chen <cl@...k-chips.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] soc: rockchip: power-domain: Add
GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON support
On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 at 08:16, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com> wrote:
>
> If low level driver claims to keep its own power domain always on,
> let pd driver respect the flag of GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2: None
>
> drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c b/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c
> index cb0f938..b2bb458 100644
> --- a/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c
> +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c
> @@ -621,6 +621,9 @@ static int rockchip_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
> {
> struct rockchip_pm_domain *pd = to_rockchip_pd(domain);
>
> + if (pd->genpd.flags & GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON)
> + return 0;
During system suspend, genpd may try to power off the PM domains that
have the GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON being set.
It seems like you need to prevent the PM domains from being power off
during system suspend too, right? In that case, why not use
GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON instead?
Or maybe the use case is different, let's continue to discuss patch5 first.
> +
> return rockchip_pd_power(pd, false);
> }
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists