[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241009151728.300477-3-yizhou.tang@shopee.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 23:17:28 +0800
From: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@...pee.com>
To: jack@...e.cz,
hch@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@...pee.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/page-writeback.c: Fix comment of wb_domain_writeout_add()
From: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@...pee.com>
__bdi_writeout_inc() has undergone multiple renamings, but the comment
within the function body have not been updated accordingly. Update it
to reflect the latest wb_domain_writeout_add().
Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@...pee.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
mm/page-writeback.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index c7c6b58a8461..72a5d8836425 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ static void wb_domain_writeout_add(struct wb_domain *dom,
/* First event after period switching was turned off? */
if (unlikely(!dom->period_time)) {
/*
- * We can race with other __bdi_writeout_inc calls here but
+ * We can race with other wb_domain_writeout_add calls here but
* it does not cause any harm since the resulting time when
* timer will fire and what is in writeout_period_time will be
* roughly the same.
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists