[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bff897a52650dbd499a83d955645cbc2290f80ce.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 16:45:40 +0200
From: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
To: Guillaume Stols <gstols@...libre.com>, Uwe
Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen
<lars@...afoo.de>, Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
aardelean@...libre.com, dlechner@...libre.com, jstephan@...libre.com,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] iio: adc: ad7606: Disable PWM usage for non
backend version
On Wed, 2024-10-09 at 09:19 +0000, Guillaume Stols wrote:
> Since the pwm was introduced before backend, there was a mock use, with
> a GPIO emulation. Now that iio backend is introduced, the mock use can
> be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Stols <gstols@...libre.com>
> ---
Maybe this was agreed on the previous iterations but I wonder if we shouldn't just
bring PWM support in the same patch as backend support is added...
- Nuno Sá
Powered by blists - more mailing lists