[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhSyWNKqustrTjA1uUaZa_jA-KjtzpKdJ4ikSUKoi7iV0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 11:36:01 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>
Cc: zohar@...ux.ibm.com, dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, eric.snowberg@...cle.com,
jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, ebpqwerty472123@...il.com,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ima: Remove inode lock
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 12:57 PM Roberto Sassu
<roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>
> From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
>
> Move out the mutex in the ima_iint_cache structure to a new structure
> called ima_iint_cache_lock, so that a lock can be taken regardless of
> whether or not inode integrity metadata are stored in the inode.
>
> Introduce ima_inode_security() to simplify accessing the new structure in
> the inode security blob.
>
> Move the mutex initialization and annotation in the new function
> ima_inode_alloc_security() and introduce ima_iint_lock() and
> ima_iint_unlock() to respectively lock and unlock the mutex.
>
> Finally, expand the critical region in process_measurement() guarded by
> iint->mutex up to where the inode was locked, use only one iint lock in
> __ima_inode_hash(), since the mutex is now in the inode security blob, and
> replace the inode_lock()/inode_unlock() calls in ima_check_last_writer().
>
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
> ---
> security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 26 ++++++++---
> security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 4 +-
> security/integrity/ima/ima_iint.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 39 +++++++---------
> 4 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
I'm not an IMA expert, but it looks reasonable to me, although
shouldn't this carry a stable CC in the patch metadata?
Reviewed-by: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists