[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <262f4d14-1c48-4974-8c14-c01fab7ff98a@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 10:58:06 +0800
From: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@...e.com>
To: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>, glass.su@...e.com
Cc: ocfs2-devel@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ocfs2: adjust spinlock_t ip_lock protection scope
On 10/8/24 15:18, Joseph Qi wrote:
> This is a standalone cleanup, so please send in a separate thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Joseph
No problem.
-Heming
>
> On 9/8/24 10:07 PM, Heming Zhao wrote:
>> Some of the spinlock_t ip_lock protection scopes are incorrect and
>> should follow the usage in 'struct ocfs2_inode_info'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@...e.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Su Yue <glass.su@...e.com>
>> ---
>> fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 3 ++-
>> fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 5 +++--
>> fs/ocfs2/resize.c | 4 ++--
>> fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c | 2 +-
>> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
>> index da78a04d6f0b..4a5900c8dc8f 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
>> @@ -2232,6 +2232,8 @@ static int ocfs2_refresh_inode_from_lvb(struct inode *inode)
>> else
>> inode->i_blocks = ocfs2_inode_sector_count(inode);
>> ... ...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists