[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZwayRgFsfgZglODN@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 06:41:42 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>
Cc: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, xavier_qy@....com,
lizefan.x@...edance.com, hannes@...xchg.org, mkoutny@...e.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jserv@...s.ncku.edu.tw,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Enhance union-find with KUnit tests and
optimization improvements
On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 10:53:08AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> The current union_find code is pretty small. Putting it there in lib allows
> it to be used by other kernel subsystems when needed. I believe it should
> stay in lib. If a slight increase in kernel size is a concern, we can update
> the Makefile to make its build depend on CONFIG_CPUSETS which can be taken
> out when it is being used by another kernel subsystem.
Yeah, let's CONFIG it for nwo and see whether there are more use cases. If
that doesn't happen, we can fold it back into cpuset.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists