lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241009113811.1e84de60@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 11:38:11 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Johannes Berg
 <johannes.berg@...el.com>, Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, Linux
 Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Philipp Hortmann
 <philipp.g.hortmann@...il.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with Linus' tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-next tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/staging/ks7010/TODO

between commit:

  d93e795b8621 ("staging: ks7010: Remove unused driver")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  4991d2e7ad38 ("staging: don't recommend using lib80211")

from the wireless-next tree.

I fixed it up (I just removed the file) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ