[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241009180500.87367-1-technoboy85@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 19:05:00 +0100
From: Matteo Croce <technoboy85@...il.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
Matteo Croce <teknoraver@...a.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix argument type in bpf_loop documentation
From: Matteo Croce <teknoraver@...a.com>
The `index` argument to bpf_loop() is threaded as an u64.
This lead in a subtle verifier denial where clang cloned the argument
in another register[1].
[1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/34650#issuecomment-2401092895
Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <teknoraver@...a.com>
---
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 8ab4d8184b9d..874af0186fe8 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -5371,7 +5371,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
* Currently, the **flags** must be 0. Currently, nr_loops is
* limited to 1 << 23 (~8 million) loops.
*
- * long (\*callback_fn)(u32 index, void \*ctx);
+ * long (\*callback_fn)(u64 index, void \*ctx);
*
* where **index** is the current index in the loop. The index
* is zero-indexed.
--
2.46.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists