linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: Fix spelling error in remoteproc.rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEO-vhFrEopCh+qUmueOOqwC0MWW6dLeqJP7mTNXJ_sY3GrHGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 12:08:50 -0600
From: "Everest K.C." <everestkc@...restkc.com.np>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, andersson@...nel.org, 
	skhan@...uxfoundation.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: Fix spelling error in remoteproc.rst

On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 12:06 PM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
>
> "Everest K.C." <everestkc@...restkc.com.np> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 9:54 AM Mathieu Poirier
> > <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Good morning,
> >>
> >> This is a case of old english vs. new english.  Using "implementors" is still
> >> correct.  Moreover, there are 33 instances of the word "implementor" in the
> >> kernel tree.  Unless there is an effor to change all occurences I will not move
> >> forward with this patch.
> > I can work on changing all 33 instances of the word "implementor".
> > Should I create a patchset for it ?
>
> Honestly, given that "implementor" is correct, this really doesn't seem
> like it is worth the effort and churn.
Noted.
> jon

With Regards,
Everest K.C.