[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241009193602.41797-2-tamird@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 15:36:03 -0400
From: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] XArray: minor documentation improvements
- Replace "they" with "you" where "you" is used in the preceding
sentence fragment.
- Use "erasing" rather than "storing `NULL`" when describing multi-index
entries. Split this into a separate sentence.
- Add "call" parentheses on "xa_store" for consistency and
linkification.
Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
---
Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst b/Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst
index 77e0ece2b1d6..d79d4e4ceff6 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst
@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ call xa_tag_pointer() to create an entry with a tag, xa_untag_pointer()
to turn a tagged entry back into an untagged pointer and xa_pointer_tag()
to retrieve the tag of an entry. Tagged pointers use the same bits that
are used to distinguish value entries from normal pointers, so you must
-decide whether they want to store value entries or tagged pointers in
-any particular XArray.
+decide whether use want to store value entries or tagged pointers in any
+particular XArray.
The XArray does not support storing IS_ERR() pointers as some
conflict with value entries or internal entries.
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ An unusual feature of the XArray is the ability to create entries which
occupy a range of indices. Once stored to, looking up any index in
the range will return the same entry as looking up any other index in
the range. Storing to any index will store to all of them. Multi-index
-entries can be explicitly split into smaller entries, or storing ``NULL``
-into any entry will cause the XArray to forget about the range.
+entries can be explicitly split into smaller entries. Erasing any entry
+will cause the XArray to forget about the range.
Normal API
==========
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ allocated ones. A freshly-initialised XArray contains a ``NULL``
pointer at every index.
You can then set entries using xa_store() and get entries
-using xa_load(). xa_store will overwrite any entry with the
+using xa_load(). xa_store() will overwrite any entry with the
new entry and return the previous entry stored at that index. You can
use xa_erase() instead of calling xa_store() with a
``NULL`` entry. There is no difference between an entry that has never
--
2.47.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists