[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANDhNCojYH=c8Dqgi2nPP4tK7QPqxpQMLCCAyrDJbyhv2761gg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 12:58:32 -0700
From: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
To: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Christopher S Hall <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/25] timekeeping: Abort clocksource change in case of failure
On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 1:29 AM Anna-Maria Behnsen
<anna-maria@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> There is no point to go through a full timekeeping update when acquiring a
> module reference or enabling the new clocksource fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists