| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CA+fCnZeMRZZe4A0QW4SSnEgXFEnb287PgHd5hVq8AA4itBFxEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 22:18:46 +0200
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>
To: Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov <snovitoll@...il.com>
Cc: elver@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
dvyukov@...gle.com, glider@...gle.com, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, ryabinin.a.a@...il.com,
syzbot+61123a5daeb9f7454599@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
vincenzo.frascino@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm, kasan, kmsan: copy_from/to_kernel_nofault
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 9:28 PM Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov <snovitoll@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Instrument copy_from_kernel_nofault() with KMSAN for uninitialized kernel
> memory check and copy_to_kernel_nofault() with KASAN, KCSAN to detect
> the memory corruption.
>
> syzbot reported that bpf_probe_read_kernel() kernel helper triggered
> KASAN report via kasan_check_range() which is not the expected behaviour
> as copy_from_kernel_nofault() is meant to be a non-faulting helper.
>
> Solution is, suggested by Marco Elver, to replace KASAN, KCSAN check in
> copy_from_kernel_nofault() with KMSAN detection of copying uninitilaized
> kernel memory. In copy_to_kernel_nofault() we can retain
> instrument_write() explicitly for the memory corruption instrumentation.
>
> copy_to_kernel_nofault() is tested on x86_64 and arm64 with
> CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS. On arm64 with CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS,
> kunit test currently fails. Need more clarification on it
> - currently, disabled in kunit test.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CANpmjNMAVFzqnCZhEity9cjiqQ9CVN1X7qeeeAp_6yKjwKo8iw@mail.gmail.com/
> Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> Reported-by: syzbot+61123a5daeb9f7454599@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=61123a5daeb9f7454599
> Reported-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210505
> Signed-off-by: Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov <snovitoll@...il.com>
(Back from travels, looking at the patches again.)
> ---
> v2:
> - squashed previous submitted in -mm tree 2 patches based on Linus tree
> v3:
> - moved checks to *_nofault_loop macros per Marco's comments
> - edited the commit message
> v4:
> - replaced Suggested-By with Reviewed-By: Marco Elver
> ---
> mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/kmsan/kmsan_test.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> mm/maccess.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c b/mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c
> index a181e4780d9d..5cff90f831db 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c
> @@ -1954,6 +1954,32 @@ static void rust_uaf(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, kasan_test_rust_uaf());
> }
>
> +static void copy_to_kernel_nofault_oob(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + char *ptr;
> + char buf[128];
> + size_t size = sizeof(buf);
> +
> + /* Not detecting fails currently with HW_TAGS */
Let's reword this to:
This test currently fails with the HW_TAGS mode. The reason is unknown
and needs to be investigated.
> + KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_OFF(test, CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS);
> +
> + ptr = kmalloc(size - KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
> + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS)) {
> + /* Check that the returned pointer is tagged. */
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_GE(test, (u8)get_tag(ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_MIN);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_LT(test, (u8)get_tag(ptr), (u8)KASAN_TAG_KERNEL);
> + }
Let's drop the checks above: if pointers returned by kmalloc are not
tagged, the checks below (and many other tests) will fail.
> +
Please add a comment here explaining why we only check
copy_to_kernel_nofault and not copy_from_kernel_nofault (is this
because we cannot add KASAN instrumentation to
copy_from_kernel_nofault?).
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
> + copy_to_kernel_nofault(&buf[0], ptr, size));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
> + copy_to_kernel_nofault(ptr, &buf[0], size));
> + kfree(ptr);
> +}
> +
> static struct kunit_case kasan_kunit_test_cases[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(kmalloc_oob_right),
> KUNIT_CASE(kmalloc_oob_left),
> @@ -2027,6 +2053,7 @@ static struct kunit_case kasan_kunit_test_cases[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(match_all_not_assigned),
> KUNIT_CASE(match_all_ptr_tag),
> KUNIT_CASE(match_all_mem_tag),
> + KUNIT_CASE(copy_to_kernel_nofault_oob),
> KUNIT_CASE(rust_uaf),
> {}
> };
> diff --git a/mm/kmsan/kmsan_test.c b/mm/kmsan/kmsan_test.c
> index 13236d579eba..9733a22c46c1 100644
> --- a/mm/kmsan/kmsan_test.c
> +++ b/mm/kmsan/kmsan_test.c
> @@ -640,6 +640,22 @@ static void test_unpoison_memory(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, report_matches(&expect));
> }
>
> +static void test_copy_from_kernel_nofault(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + long ret;
> + char buf[4], src[4];
> + size_t size = sizeof(buf);
> +
> + EXPECTATION_UNINIT_VALUE_FN(expect, "copy_from_kernel_nofault");
> + kunit_info(
> + test,
> + "testing copy_from_kernel_nofault with uninitialized memory\n");
> +
> + ret = copy_from_kernel_nofault((char *)&buf[0], (char *)&src[0], size);
> + USE(ret);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, report_matches(&expect));
> +}
> +
> static struct kunit_case kmsan_test_cases[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(test_uninit_kmalloc),
> KUNIT_CASE(test_init_kmalloc),
> @@ -664,6 +680,7 @@ static struct kunit_case kmsan_test_cases[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(test_long_origin_chain),
> KUNIT_CASE(test_stackdepot_roundtrip),
> KUNIT_CASE(test_unpoison_memory),
> + KUNIT_CASE(test_copy_from_kernel_nofault),
> {},
> };
>
> diff --git a/mm/maccess.c b/mm/maccess.c
> index 518a25667323..3ca55ec63a6a 100644
> --- a/mm/maccess.c
> +++ b/mm/maccess.c
> @@ -13,9 +13,14 @@ bool __weak copy_from_kernel_nofault_allowed(const void *unsafe_src,
> return true;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * The below only uses kmsan_check_memory() to ensure uninitialized kernel
> + * memory isn't leaked.
> + */
> #define copy_from_kernel_nofault_loop(dst, src, len, type, err_label) \
> while (len >= sizeof(type)) { \
> - __get_kernel_nofault(dst, src, type, err_label); \
> + __get_kernel_nofault(dst, src, type, err_label); \
> + kmsan_check_memory(src, sizeof(type)); \
> dst += sizeof(type); \
> src += sizeof(type); \
> len -= sizeof(type); \
> @@ -49,7 +54,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(copy_from_kernel_nofault);
>
> #define copy_to_kernel_nofault_loop(dst, src, len, type, err_label) \
> while (len >= sizeof(type)) { \
> - __put_kernel_nofault(dst, src, type, err_label); \
> + __put_kernel_nofault(dst, src, type, err_label); \
> + instrument_write(dst, sizeof(type)); \
> dst += sizeof(type); \
> src += sizeof(type); \
> len -= sizeof(type); \
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists