| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <6706eec7.050a0220.67064.0054.GAE@google.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 13:59:51 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+325b61d3c9a17729454b@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in hfsplus_file_extend
For archival purposes, forwarding an incoming command email to
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com.
***
Subject: Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in hfsplus_file_extend
Author: sandeen@...deen.net
#syz test: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git ffcd06b6d13b72823aba0d7c871f7e4876e7916b
On 11/26/22 2:07 AM, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit: 0b1dcc2cf55a Merge tag 'mm-hotfixes-stable-2022-11-24' of ..
> git tree: upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=138ad173880000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=436ee340148d5197
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=325b61d3c9a17729454b
> compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
>
> Downloadable assets:
> disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/3af32b89453e/disk-0b1dcc2c.raw.xz
> vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/063b631f0d64/vmlinux-0b1dcc2c.xz
> kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/959ae1bdec1b/bzImage-0b1dcc2c.xz
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+325b61d3c9a17729454b@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 6.1.0-rc6-syzkaller-00251-g0b1dcc2cf55a #0 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> syz-executor.2/23177 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffff88805c843dc8 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_file_extend+0x1bf/0xf60 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:457
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffff888089d400b0 (&tree->tree_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_find_init+0x1bb/0x230 fs/hfsplus/bfind.c:30
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #1 (&tree->tree_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
> __mutex_lock+0x12f/0x1360 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
> hfsplus_file_truncate+0xe87/0x10d0 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:595
> hfsplus_setattr+0x1f2/0x320 fs/hfsplus/inode.c:269
> notify_change+0xcd4/0x1440 fs/attr.c:420
> do_truncate+0x140/0x200 fs/open.c:65
> handle_truncate fs/namei.c:3216 [inline]
> do_open fs/namei.c:3561 [inline]
> path_openat+0x2143/0x2860 fs/namei.c:3714
> do_filp_open+0x1ba/0x410 fs/namei.c:3741
> do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x4c0 fs/open.c:1310
> do_sys_open fs/open.c:1326 [inline]
> __do_sys_creat fs/open.c:1402 [inline]
> __se_sys_creat fs/open.c:1396 [inline]
> __x64_sys_creat+0xcd/0x120 fs/open.c:1396
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> -> #0 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
> check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
> check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
> validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831 [inline]
> __lock_acquire+0x2a43/0x56d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
> lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668 [inline]
> lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x630 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5633
> __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
> __mutex_lock+0x12f/0x1360 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
> hfsplus_file_extend+0x1bf/0xf60 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:457
> hfsplus_bmap_reserve+0x31c/0x410 fs/hfsplus/btree.c:358
> hfsplus_create_cat+0x1ea/0x10d0 fs/hfsplus/catalog.c:272
> hfsplus_fill_super+0x1544/0x1a30 fs/hfsplus/super.c:560
> mount_bdev+0x351/0x410 fs/super.c:1401
> legacy_get_tree+0x109/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:610
> vfs_get_tree+0x8d/0x2f0 fs/super.c:1531
> do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3040 [inline]
> path_mount+0x132a/0x1e20 fs/namespace.c:3370
> do_mount fs/namespace.c:3383 [inline]
> __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline]
> __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3568 [inline]
> __x64_sys_mount+0x283/0x300 fs/namespace.c:3568
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(&tree->tree_lock);
> lock(&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock);
> lock(&tree->tree_lock);
> lock(&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> 3 locks held by syz-executor.2/23177:
> #0: ffff888077b000e0 (&type->s_umount_key#58/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0x22e/0xb60 fs/super.c:228
> #1: ffff888026292998 (&sbi->vh_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_fill_super+0x14cd/0x1a30 fs/hfsplus/super.c:553
> #2: ffff888089d400b0 (&tree->tree_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_find_init+0x1bb/0x230 fs/hfsplus/bfind.c:30
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 0 PID: 23177 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc6-syzkaller-00251-g0b1dcc2cf55a #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
> dump_stack_lvl+0xd1/0x138 lib/dump_stack.c:106
> check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2177
> check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
> check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
> validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831 [inline]
> __lock_acquire+0x2a43/0x56d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
> lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668 [inline]
> lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x630 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5633
> __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
> __mutex_lock+0x12f/0x1360 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
> hfsplus_file_extend+0x1bf/0xf60 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:457
> hfsplus_bmap_reserve+0x31c/0x410 fs/hfsplus/btree.c:358
> hfsplus_create_cat+0x1ea/0x10d0 fs/hfsplus/catalog.c:272
> hfsplus_fill_super+0x1544/0x1a30 fs/hfsplus/super.c:560
> mount_bdev+0x351/0x410 fs/super.c:1401
> legacy_get_tree+0x109/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:610
> vfs_get_tree+0x8d/0x2f0 fs/super.c:1531
> do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3040 [inline]
> path_mount+0x132a/0x1e20 fs/namespace.c:3370
> do_mount fs/namespace.c:3383 [inline]
> __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline]
> __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3568 [inline]
> __x64_sys_mount+0x283/0x300 fs/namespace.c:3568
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> RIP: 0033:0x7f752048d60a
> Code: 48 c7 c2 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb d2 e8 b8 04 00 00 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 49 89 ca b8 a5 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007f7521100f88 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000005f8 RCX: 00007f752048d60a
> RDX: 0000000020000600 RSI: 0000000020000040 RDI: 00007f7521100fe0
> RBP: 00007f7521101020 R08: 00007f7521101020 R09: 0000000001a00050
> R10: 0000000001a00050 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000020000600
> R13: 0000000020000040 R14: 00007f7521100fe0 R15: 0000000020000280
> </TASK>
>
>
> ---
> This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
> syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
>
> syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists