lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYv=Ld-YCpWaV2X=ErcyfEQC8DA1jy+cOhmviEHGS9mh-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 11:52:38 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, 
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, 
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, 
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, 
	broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.10 000/482] 6.10.14-rc1 review

On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 at 17:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.10.14 release.
> There are 482 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 10 Oct 2024 11:55:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.10.14-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


The LTP syscalls fanotify22 test failed  (broken).
This regression is noticed on linux.6.10.y, linux.6.11.y and linux.6.6.y.

We are bisecting this issue.

 ltp-syscalls
  - fanotify22

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

Test log,
-----------
fanotify16.c:751[  452.527701] EXT4-fs error (device loop0):
__ext4_remount:6522: comm fanotify22: Abort forced by user
tst_device.c:96: TINFO: Found free device 0 '/dev/loop0'
tst_test.c:1106: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with ext4 opts='' extra opts=''
mke2fs 1.47.1 (20-May-2024)
tst_test.c:1120: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop0 to
/scratch/ltp-6nPLv2EGcV/LTP_fanbDvQcT/test_mnt fstyp=ext4 flags=0
tst_test.c:1733: TINFO: LTP version: 20240524
tst_test.c:1617: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 02m 30s
fanotify.h:122: TINFO: fid(test_mnt/internal_dir/bad_dir) =
6bd2dab9.86fe4716.7e82.df82837f.0...
fanotify.h:122: TINFO: fid(test_mnt/internal_dir) =
6bd2dab9.86fe4716.7e81.beaa198d.0...
fanotify22.c:278: TINFO: Umounting
/scratch/ltp-6nPLv2EGcV/LTP_fanbDvQcT/test_mnt
debugfs 1.47.1 (20-May-2024)
debugfs 1.47.1 (20-May-2024)
fanotify22.c:281: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop0 to
/scratch/ltp-6nPLv2EGcV/LTP_fanbDvQcT/test_mnt fstyp=ext4 flags=0
fanotify.h:122: TINFO: fid(test_mnt) = 6bd2dab9.86fe4716.2.0.0...
fanotify22.c:59: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop0 to
/scratch/ltp-6nPLv2EGcV/LTP_fanbDvQcT/test_mnt fstyp=ext4 flags=21
fanotify22.c:59: TBROK: mount(/dev/loop0, test_mnt, ext4, 33,
0x5659a1d5) failed: EROFS (30)

HINT: You _MAY_ be missing kernel fixes:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=124e7c61deb2

Summary:
passed   0
failed   0
broken   1

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ