[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f4f697fb-35d8-48a0-8299-c7020c4a0900@leemhuis.info>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 10:50:43 +0200
From: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
<regressions@...mhuis.info>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Robert Gill <rtgill82@...il.com>, Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@...tonmail.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, antonio.gomez.iglesias@...ux.intel.com,
daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] Fix dosemu vm86() fault
On 09.10.24 00:48, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 10/8/24 06:52, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. Top-posting
>> for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone.
>>
>> Is there hope that patches like these makes it to mainline any time
>> soon?
>
> Unless it breaks something again:
>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?h=x86/urgent&id=785bf1ab58aa1f89a5dfcb17b682b7089d69c34f
>
> ;)
:-D
Great, thx!
>> This yet again makes me wonder if some "[regression fix]" in the subject
>> or "CC: regressions@...ts.linux.dev" in the patches would help to make
>> the regression aspect obvious to everyone involved. But it would create
>> yet another small bit of overhead
>
> In this case, not really. This was a typical email screwup where I
> didn't pick up that there was an updated patch that got appended to a
> reply among the normal email noise.
>
> We've been poking at this pretty regularly since getting back from Plumbers.
Many thx!
Ciao, Thorsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists