[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZwZjlSZKoJ9np3td@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 12:05:57 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
alistair.francis@....com, richard.henderson@...aro.org,
jim.shu@...ive.com, andybnac@...il.com, kito.cheng@...ive.com,
charlie@...osinc.com, atishp@...osinc.com, evan@...osinc.com,
cleger@...osinc.com, alexghiti@...osinc.com,
samitolvanen@...gle.com, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao.osdev@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/33] riscv control-flow integrity for usermode
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 03:36:42PM -0700, Deepak Gupta wrote:
> Equivalent to landing pad (zicfilp) on x86 is `ENDBRANCH` instruction in Intel
> CET [3] and branch target identification (BTI) [4] on arm.
> Similarly x86's Intel CET has shadow stack [5] and arm64 has guarded control
> stack (GCS) [6] which are very similar to risc-v's zicfiss shadow stack.
> x86 already supports shadow stack for user mode and arm64 support for GCS in
> usermode [7] is ongoing.
FWIW the arm64 support is now in -next, including these:
> Mark Brown (2):
> mm: Introduce ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK
> prctl: arch-agnostic prctl for shadow stack
shared changes to generic code.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists