[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZwlG9AKToZFFPAvi@KILLINGMACHINE>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 18:40:36 +0300
From: Sergey Matsievskiy <matsievskiysv@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, quentin.schulz@...tlin.com,
lars.povlsen@...rochip.com, horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pinctrl: ocelot: fix system hang on level based
interrupts
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 11:18:55AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> I'm a bit puzzled by the patch because I don't understand it.
The current implementation only calls chained_irq_enter() and chained_irq_exit()
if it detects pending interrupts.
```
for (i = 0; i < info->stride; i++) {
uregmap_read(info->map, id_reg + 4 * i, ®);
if (!reg)
continue;
chained_irq_enter(parent_chip, desc);
```
However, in case of GPIO pin configured in level mode and the parent controller
configured in edge mode, GPIO interrupt might be lowered by the hardware. In the
result,if the interrupt is short enough, the parent interrupt is still pending
while the GPIO interrupt is cleared; chained_irq_enter() never gets called and
the system hangs trying to service the parent interrupt.
Moving chained_irq_enter() and chained_irq_exit() outside the for loop ensures
that they are called even when GPIO interrupt is lowered by the hardware.
The similar code with chained_irq_enter() / chained_irq_exit() functions
wrapping interrupt checking loop may be found in many other drivers:
```
grep -r -A 10 chained_irq_enter drivers/pinctrl
```
> This needs to describe how moving the chained irq calls achieves
> this effect.
If the explanation above satisfies you, I'll elaborate the commit message and
resend the patch.
--
Sergey Matsievskiy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists