[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d70bbad7-bcad-2031-a4e1-755b502422a4@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 01:34:52 +0000
From: MUKESH RATHOR <mukeshrathor@...rosoft.com>
To: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>, Nuno Das Neves
<nunodasneves@...ux.microsoft.com>, "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, "virtualization@...ts.linux.dev"
<virtualization@...ts.linux.dev>
CC: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>, Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>, "will@...nel.org"
<will@...nel.org>, "luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>, "tglx@...utronix.de"
<tglx@...utronix.de>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "bp@...en8.de"
<bp@...en8.de>, "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>, "pbonzini@...hat.com"
<pbonzini@...hat.com>, "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, "joro@...tes.org"
<joro@...tes.org>, "robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com"
<edumazet@...gle.com>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "lpieralisi@...nel.org"
<lpieralisi@...nel.org>, "kw@...ux.com" <kw@...ux.com>, "robh@...nel.org"
<robh@...nel.org>, "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "sgarzare@...hat.com" <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
"jinankjain@...ux.microsoft.com" <jinankjain@...ux.microsoft.com>,
"muminulrussell@...il.com" <muminulrussell@...il.com>,
"skinsburskii@...ux.microsoft.com" <skinsburskii@...ux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: [PATCH 0/5] Add new headers for Hyper-V Dom0
On 10/10/24 11:21, Michael Kelley wrote:
> From: Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@...ux.microsoft.com> Sent:
Thursday, October 3, 2024 12:51 PM
>>
>> To support Hyper-V Dom0 (aka Linux as root partition), many new
>> definitions are required.
>>
>> The plan going forward is to directly import headers from
>> Hyper-V. This is a more maintainable way to import definitions
>> rather than via the TLFS doc. This patch series introduces
>> new headers (hvhdk.h, hvgdk.h, etc, see patch #3) directly
>> derived from Hyper-V code.
>>
>> This patch series replaces hyperv-tlfs.h with hvhdk.h, but only
>> in Microsoft-maintained Hyper-V code where they are needed. This
>> leaves the existing hyperv-tlfs.h in use elsewhere - notably for
>> Hyper-V enlightenments on KVM guests.
>
> Could you elaborate on why the bifurcation is necessary? Is it an
> interim step until the KVM code can use the new scheme as well?
> Also, does "Hyper-V enlightenments on KVM guests" refer to
> nested KVM running at L1 on an L0 Hyper-V, and supporting L2 guests?
> Or is it the more general KVM support for mimicking Hyper-V for
> the purposes of running Windows guests? From these patches, it
> looks like your intention is for all KVM support for Hyper-V
> functionality to continue to use the existing hyperv-tlfs.h file.
Like it says above, we are creating new dom0 (root/host) support
that requires many new defs only available to dom0 and not any
guest. Hypervisor makes them publicly available via hv*dk files.
Ideally, someday everybody will use those, I hope we can move in
that direction, but I guess one step at a time. For now, KVM can
continue to use the tlfs file, and if there is no resistance, we
can move them to hv*dk files also as next step and obsolete the
single tlfs file.
Since headers are the ultimate source of truth, this will allow
better maintenance, better debug/support experience, and a more
stable stack. It also enforces non-leaking of data structs from
private header files (unfortunately has happened).
Thanks
-Mukesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists