[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZwlN6F__ls3naxJq@google.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 09:10:16 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@....com>
Cc: pbonzini@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
x86@...nel.org, john.allen@....com, davem@...emloft.net,
thomas.lendacky@....com, michael.roth@....com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/sev: Add SEV-SNP CipherTextHiding support
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
> index 564daf748293..77900abb1b46 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c
> @@ -73,11 +73,27 @@ static bool psp_init_on_probe = true;
> module_param(psp_init_on_probe, bool, 0444);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(psp_init_on_probe, " if true, the PSP will be initialized on module init. Else the PSP will be initialized on the first command requiring it");
>
> +static bool cipher_text_hiding = true;
> +module_param(cipher_text_hiding, bool, 0444);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(cipher_text_hiding, " if true, the PSP will enable Cipher Text Hiding");
> +
> +static int max_snp_asid;
Why is this a signed int? '0' is used as the magic "no override" value, so there's
no reason to allow a negative value.
> +module_param(max_snp_asid, int, 0444);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_snp_asid, " override MAX_SNP_ASID for Cipher Text Hiding");
> +
> MODULE_FIRMWARE("amd/amd_sev_fam17h_model0xh.sbin"); /* 1st gen EPYC */
> MODULE_FIRMWARE("amd/amd_sev_fam17h_model3xh.sbin"); /* 2nd gen EPYC */
> MODULE_FIRMWARE("amd/amd_sev_fam19h_model0xh.sbin"); /* 3rd gen EPYC */
> MODULE_FIRMWARE("amd/amd_sev_fam19h_model1xh.sbin"); /* 4th gen EPYC */
>
> +/* Cipher Text Hiding Enabled */
> +bool snp_cipher_text_hiding;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(snp_cipher_text_hiding);
> +
> +/* MAX_SNP_ASID */
> +unsigned int snp_max_snp_asid;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(snp_max_snp_asid);
There is zero reason to have multiple variables. The module param varaibles
should be the single source of true.
I'm also not entirely sure exporting individual variables is the right interface,
which is another reason why I want to see the entire "refactoring" in one series.
> static bool psp_dead;
> static int psp_timeout;
>
> @@ -1064,6 +1080,38 @@ static void snp_set_hsave_pa(void *arg)
> wrmsrl(MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA, 0);
> }
>
> +static void sev_snp_enable_ciphertext_hiding(struct sev_data_snp_init_ex *data, int *error)
> +{
> + struct psp_device *psp = psp_master;
> + struct sev_device *sev;
> + unsigned int edx;
> +
> + sev = psp->sev_data;
> +
> + /*
> + * Check if CipherTextHiding feature is supported and enabled
> + * in the Platform/BIOS.
> + */
> + if ((sev->feat_info.ecx & SNP_CIPHER_TEXT_HIDING_SUPPORTED) &&
> + sev->snp_plat_status.ciphertext_hiding_cap) {
snp_cipher_text_hiding should be set to %false if CipherTextHiding is unsupported.
I.e. the module params need to reflect reality.
> + /* Retrieve SEV CPUID information */
> + edx = cpuid_edx(0x8000001f);
> + /* Do sanity checks on user-defined MAX_SNP_ASID */
> + if (max_snp_asid >= edx) {
> + dev_info(sev->dev, "max_snp_asid module parameter is not valid, limiting to %d\n",
> + edx - 1);
> + max_snp_asid = edx - 1;
> + }
> + snp_max_snp_asid = max_snp_asid ? : (edx - 1) / 2;
> +
> + snp_cipher_text_hiding = 1;
s/1/true
> + data->ciphertext_hiding_en = 1;
> + data->max_snp_asid = snp_max_snp_asid;
> +
> + dev_dbg(sev->dev, "SEV-SNP CipherTextHiding feature support enabled\n");
> + }
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists