[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241011165640.GA2475122-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 11:56:40 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Yassine Oudjana <yassine.oudjana@...il.com>
Cc: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@...tonmail.com>,
Andy Teng <andy.teng@...iatek.com>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/8] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl:
Pull pinctrl node changes from MT6795 document
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 03:03:46PM +0300, Yassine Oudjana wrote:
> From: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@...tonmail.com>
>
> mediatek,pinctrl-mt6795.yaml has different node name patterns which match
> bindings of other MediaTek pin controllers, ref for pinmux-node.yaml which
> has a description of the pinmux property, as well as some additional
> descriptions for some pin configuration properties. Pull those changes
> into mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml and adjust the example DTS to match in
> preparation to combine the MT6795 document into it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@...tonmail.com>
> ---
> .../pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml | 38 ++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml
> index 3bbc00df5548d..352a88d7b135e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt6779-pinctrl.yaml
> @@ -111,12 +111,12 @@ allOf:
> - "#interrupt-cells"
>
> patternProperties:
> - '-[0-9]*$':
> + '-pins$':
Worst case, this could be an ABI break. Best case, it's churn for
mt6779. Is it worth unifying?
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists