lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96008557-8ff4-44cc-b5e3-ce242212f1a3@stanley.mountain>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 22:43:44 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: cleanup variable name in ext4_fc_del()

The variables "&EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_fc_lock" and "&sbi->s_fc_lock"
are the same lock.  This function uses a mix of both, which is a bit
unsightly and confuses Smatch.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
---
 fs/ext4/fast_commit.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
index b33664f6ce2a..e4cb1356e9b6 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
@@ -291,9 +291,9 @@ void ext4_fc_del(struct inode *inode)
 		return;
 
 restart:
-	spin_lock(&EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_fc_lock);
+	spin_lock(&sbi->s_fc_lock);
 	if (list_empty(&ei->i_fc_list) && list_empty(&ei->i_fc_dilist)) {
-		spin_unlock(&EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_fc_lock);
+		spin_unlock(&sbi->s_fc_lock);
 		return;
 	}
 
-- 
2.45.2


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ