lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d9bf3c-4916-46fa-b07f-c44d5295ba35@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 15:24:57 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: <babu.moger@....com>, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC: "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>, "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "mingo@...hat.com"
	<mingo@...hat.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
	"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "x86@...nel.org"
	<x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "paulmck@...nel.org"
	<paulmck@...nel.org>, "rdunlap@...radead.org" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>, "peterz@...radead.org"
	<peterz@...radead.org>, "yanjiewtw@...il.com" <yanjiewtw@...il.com>,
	"kim.phillips@....com" <kim.phillips@....com>, "lukas.bulwahn@...il.com"
	<lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>, "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
	"jmattson@...gle.com" <jmattson@...gle.com>, "leitao@...ian.org"
	<leitao@...ian.org>, "jpoimboe@...nel.org" <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, "Edgecombe,
 Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, "kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com"
	<kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, "Joseph, Jithu" <jithu.joseph@...el.com>,
	"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>, "kan.liang@...ux.intel.com"
	<kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, "daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com"
	<daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>, "pbonzini@...hat.com"
	<pbonzini@...hat.com>, "sandipan.das@....com" <sandipan.das@....com>,
	"ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com" <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"peternewman@...gle.com" <peternewman@...gle.com>, "Wieczor-Retman, Maciej"
	<maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>, "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Eranian, Stephane" <eranian@...gle.com>,
	"james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 07/25] x86/resctrl: Introduce the interface to display
 monitor mode



On 10/10/24 8:30 AM, Moger, Babu wrote:
> On 10/10/24 10:07, Luck, Tony wrote:
>>>>> +  By default resctrl assumes each control and monitor group has a hardware
>>>>> +  counter. Hardware that does not support 'mbm_cntr_assign' mode will still
>>>>> +  allow more control or monitor groups than 'num_rmids' to be created. In
>>>>
>>>> Should that be s/num_rmids/num_mbm_cntrs/ ?
>>>
>>> It is actually num_rmids here as in default mode, num_rmid_cntrs are not
>>> available.
>>
>> Babu,
>>
>> The code isn't working that way for me. I built & booted. Since I'm on
>> an Intel machine without ABMC I'm in "default" mode. But I can't make
>> more monitor groups that num_rmids.
>>
> 
> That is correct. We will have to change the text. How about?
> 
> "default":
> By default resctrl assumes each control and monitor group has a hardware
> counter. Hardware that does not support 'mbm_cntr_assign' mode will still

I think this is independent from whether hardware supports 'mbm_cntr_assign'
mode since a user could enable 'default' mode on hardware that supports 
'mbm_cntr_assign'. This snippet is thus more about what is meant by 'default'
mode than what is supported by hardware.

The docs already contain:
	"num_rmids":
		...
		This is the upper bound for how many "CTRL_MON" + "MON"
		groups can be created.


Neither of the 'mbm_assign_mode' options change this meaning of 'num_rmids' (i.e.
no change in how many monitor groups can be created) so mentioning it in the
'default' portion but not in the 'mbm_cntr_assign' portion may create confusion.


Perhaps it can be simplified to:
	In default mode resctrl assumes each CTRL_MON and MON group has a
	hardware counter. Reading mbm_total_bytes or mbm_local_bytes may
	report 'Unavailable' if there is no counter associated with that
	group.


> allow to create control or monitor groups up to num_rmids supported. In
> that case reading the mbm_total_bytes and mbm_local_bytes may report
> 'Unavailable' if there is no counter associated with that group.
> 

Reinette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ