[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZwjHcj9Wapb9fBVp@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 08:36:34 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@...il.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Add Microsoft Surface
Pro 9 5G
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 11:17:35PM +0200, Jérôme de Bretagne wrote:
> Le jeu. 10 oct. 2024 à 10:52, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> a écrit :
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 12:35:05AM +0200, Jérôme de Bretagne wrote:
> > You mention it in the commit message, but since a lot of this is copied
> > from the X13s (and CRD) devicetrees you should probably make that clear
> > here as well and include the relevant copyright notices. For example by
> > adding:
> >
> > Based on ...
> >
> > Copyright ...
> Thank you for the suggestion, so it would look like this?
You can still keep your copyright notice first, and I meant something
like:
/*
* Microsoft Surface Pro 9 5G devicetree
*
* Copyright (c) 2024, Jérôme de Bretagne <...>
*
* Based on sc8280xp-crd.dts and sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s.dts:
*
* Copyright (c) 2021, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2022, Linaro Limited
*/
> How do you want me to add this to the patchset?
> Should I send a separate fix-up patch?
> Or should I create a newer v3 patchset?
Ah, sorry, I missed that Bjorn had already picked this one up. Either
leave it as is, or send an incremental (fix-up) patch.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists