[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241011071707.216160-1-dengjie03@kylinos.cn>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 15:17:07 +0800
From: Deng Jie <dengjie03@...inos.cn>
To: stern@...land.harvard.edu
Cc: dengjie03@...inos.cn,
duanchenghao@...inos.cn,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
len.brown@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
pavel@....cz,
rafael@...nel.org,
xiehongyu1@...inos.cn,
xiongxin@...inos.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] USB: Fix the issue of S4 wakeup queisce phase where task resumption fails due to USB status
>> 1. Although during the S4 quiesce phase, the do_remote_wakeup flag is set
>> to 0 within the usb_suspend->choose_wakeup function, the subsequent sequence
>> of usb_suspend->usb_suspend_both->usb_suspend_device->hcd_bus_suspend->
>> xhci_bus_suspend will disable remote wakeup for the RootHub port.
>> 2. However, during the loading image phase prior to the S4 quiesce phase,
>> the USB device may have generated an interrupt, setting the WAKEUP_PENDING flag.
>> Additionally, due to the execution of freeze_kernel_threads before the loading
>> image phase, the USB interrupt generated during the loading image phase is
>> unable to execute its interrupt handler's bottom half, resulting in the
>> WAKEUP_PENDING flag remaining uncleared.
>> 3. Therefore, even though the remote wakeup for the RootHub is disabled in
>> usb_suspend_both() during the quiesce phase, due to the WAKEUP_PENDING flag not
>> being cleared, the xhci still believes that the RootHub has generated a wakeup
>> event when it attempts to suspend. Consequently, the xhci suspend function
>> returns an -EBUSY error and does not proceed with the suspend operation.
>>
>> >Now maybe things are't working the way they are supposed to. If that's
>> >so then you should submit a patch fixing the code so that it _does_ work
>> >this way.
>> >
>> >For instance, in suspend_common(), do_wakeup is derived from
>> >device_may_wakeup(rhdev), which is determined by
>> >rhdev->power.should_wakeup -- see the definition in
>> >include/linux/pm_wakeup.h. Maybe this flag isn't getting cleared
>> >properly. (In fact, at the moment I don't see where that flag gets set
>> >or cleared at all...)
>>
>> After configuring CONFIG_PM_SLEEP, the return value of device_may_wakeup
>> should be equal to dev->power.can_wakeup && !!dev->power.wakeup.
>
>Please see my reply on this other email thread, which concerns the same
>problem:
>
>https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/2c368013-8363-4a4e-bfee-2f0b14d01162@rowland.harvard.edu/
>
>I should have CC'ed you on that message, but I didn't think of it at the
>time.
>
Thank you for your reply. I will analyze it carefully.
Thanks,
Deng Jie
Powered by blists - more mailing lists