[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241011102459.zxmegrcro2tv6b46@DEN-DL-M70577>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 10:24:59 +0000
From: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
CC: <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>, <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <jensemil.schulzostergaard@...rochip.com>,
<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: microchip: vcap api: Fix memory leaks in
vcap_api_encode_rule_test()
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Fixes: a3c1e45156ad ("net: microchip: vcap: Fix use-after-free error in kunit test")
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
> index f2a5a36fdacd..7251121ab196 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c
> @@ -1444,6 +1444,8 @@ static void vcap_api_encode_rule_test(struct kunit *test)
>
> ret = vcap_del_rule(&test_vctrl, &test_netdev, id);
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
> +
> + vcap_free_rule(rule);
> }
Wait, should vcap_del_rule not handle the freeing of the rule?
Maybe Emil can shed some light on this..
/Daniel
>
> static void vcap_api_set_rule_counter_test(struct kunit *test)
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists