[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241011130641.4a8419c1@eugeo>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 13:06:41 +0100
From: Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: masahiroy@...nel.org, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor
<alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Benno Lossin
<benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Alice
Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Nathan
Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Yoann Congal <yoann.congal@...le.fr>, Randy
Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Mark Rutland
<mark.rutland@....com>, kees@...nel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, samitolvanen@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: rust: add `CONFIG_RUSTC_LLVM_VERSION`
On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 13:53:47 +0200
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 1:41 PM Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net> wrote:
> >
> > The invocation of rustc-version is being moved from init/Kconfig to
> > scripts/Kconfig.include for consistency with cc-version.
>
> Yeah, I am ambivalent. Dropping them would minimize changes and avoid
> introducing something only used once, which would be nice too. Happy
> either way.
>
Another motivation is that in my helper inline series, I need to do
arithmetic on LLVM version (divide it by 10000 to get major verison),
which isn't possible for config options, but will work for variables
defiend in Kconfig.include.
I didn't mention it in the commit message for this patch because this
is not my patch series :)
Best,
Gary
> > +if output=$("$@" --version --verbose 2>/dev/null | grep LLVM); then
>
> Similarly, I wonder if we should use '^LLVM version: ' here or similar
> to minimize the chances the "LLVM" string appears elsewhere in the
> future (perhaps in a custom string a vendor adds, though I would
> expect them to add it lowercase). We are relying on having a $3 when
> splitting anyway.
>
> Depending on what Masahiro prefers, I will take this one or the
> one-invocation-only one.
>
> Thanks Gary!
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists