lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7829230-79d1-4282-902d-ae2ac2477dc5@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 14:40:02 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
 soc@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
 Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Alexandre Belloni
 <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
 Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Conor Dooley
 <conor@...nel.org>, Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/process: maintainer-soc: clarify
 submitting patches

On 07/10/2024 19:18, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>>
>> ---
>>
>> During our LPC ad-hoc BoF, we discussed improving Maintainer SoC docs
>> and I think I volunteered to write something.  The trouble is that
>> whatever I won't write in my notes, escapes my memory.
>>
>> I believe this is what we discussed.  Was there anything more to
>> write/document?
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> 1. Fix missing closing ) (Conor).
>> 2. Style changes (in point 3.).
>> 3. Soften note that soc@...nel is not for discussing ("is usually not").
>> ---
>>  Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> Applied, thanks.

Thanks Jon and Arnd. I got now notification that this was also applied
to soc tree, so it seems it got applied twice.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ